Differences Experienced Between Test Scripting and Explanatory Testing
Test scripting and explanatory are both used in testing how the software functions or its effectiveness. You find that these methods are majorly used by test managers of software engineers to test how a new software function. You find that all of them performs the same function, but one will work better for you depending on your preferences. Below are some of the differences between test scripting and explanatory testing.
Starting with their definitions test scripting is a complex set of instructions that testers must follow to see if the desired outcome is achieved. You find that this method is detailed and it requires an intensive preparation before the actual test is commenced. If you want it to uncover all the software errors it should cover all the bases. Since a lot of work is done when dealing with test scripting makes it tiresome.
Far from that explanatory testing relies on the experience and intuition of the testers to identify and correct errors by themselves. To add on that these testers are not supplied with the expected outcome in advance. On that note it will be able to identify even the errors that test script writing could not find. In addition to that, when comparing their speed, you find that explanatory testing is faster than test scripting in identifying errors. Another thing with explanatory testing is that it does not require a lot of work.
Another comparison is matters dealing with domain knowledge, this one can be done better by the test scripting. But for it to achieve it perfectly it will require a lot of documentation and time to analyze the domain. On the other hand, the explanatory test can work better on unscripted test since it does not require the domain but just the knowledge of the testers.
Besides, test scripting is not efficient in producing detailed scripts since it is intensive and consumes a lot of time. With this, it will give a more detailed report. If you compare them, explanatory testing is faster and efficient in the production of unscripted tests though it majorly it relies on the testers to document their findings.
Another thing is that test scripting formally verifies the results against the specifications. While on explanatory testing, the results are based on the tester’s expectations against the domain knowledge. As a result, test scripting is able to cover high-risk areas within a minute which can be overlooked by explanatory testing since it depends on testers.
To sum up, when you compare the costs you will find that test explanatory is more cost effective in analyzing software than test scripting which is tiresome and requires a lot of money.
More reading: a knockout post